ITC506 Assessment Item 1- Marking Sheet

Criteria

Analysis of the ethical dilemma using the Doing Ethics Technique (DET) (Value: 70%)

Standards

HD: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, identifies all the ethical issues, evaluates all the options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and justifies why this option is the best using supporting arguments based on the literature.

DI: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, lists all the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and explains why this option is the best.

CR: Answers all DET questions, lists most of the facts, identifies most of the non-ethical issues, lists most of the stakeholders, lists most of the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and makes an attempt to explain why this option is the best.

PS: Answers some of the DET questions, lists a few facts, identifies a few non-ethical issues, lists a few stakeholders, lists a few ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these but without explaining why this option is the best.

FL: Answers a few DET questions but fails to list important facts, fails to identify relevant non-ethical issues, fails to list important stakeholders, fails to identify the ethical issues and evaluates the options that seek to resolve them and does not select the best option or does not explain why the option selected is the best.

Criteria 

Writing & structure (Value 20%)

Standards

HD: Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.

DI: Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate.

CR: Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.

PS: The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.

FL: Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.

Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains many errors.

Criteria 

Referencing (Value 10%)

Standards

HD: Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions.

DI: Very good referencing, including reference list and citations. High quality references.

CR: Good referencing, including reference list and citations. Good quality references.

PS: Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA style conventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.

FL: Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.

Q1. What's going on?

Q2. What are the facts?

Q3. What are the issues?

Q4. Who is affected?

Q5. What are the ethical issues and their implications?

Q6. What could have been done about it?

Q7. What are the options?

Q8. Which option is the best and why?

References