COST MANAGEMENT PLAN
February 27, 2022
ARABIC CALLIGRAPHY ON QASR AL WATAN IN THE UAE
February 28, 2022
Introduction
In my reflective essay, I will be using the Rolfe Reflective Framework for the development of my academic argument as well as introducing the counterarguments of my academics. The reflective key benefits of the Rolfe model are that it is related to clarity and simplicity. The tools of any reflective essay need to be accessible and useful to me for the production of meaningful outcomes, and a simple model like the Rolfe model can possibly support that.
Main Body
As per my personal resilience, the score of my overall resilience is quite high and this leads to the fact that I am quite resilient. This is considered to be indicating myself, my limitations as well as the things that I can tackle. According to the score, I enjoy myself in terms of sorting out challenges and addressing events. I have the tendency of bouncing back from the challenges and look out for positivity with adversity. My coping with challenge score is in the middle range and that implies that I am in possession of effective methods in terms of change management; however, it is tested sometimes. This has the possibility of reducing my performance in the work due to increased stress; however, it can be kept in check on a regular basis. I scored high in problem-solving and this means that I like facing problems that can be solved by me. I am quite good at solving problems and challenges and quite enjoy the heightened energy I am given by it. I scored high on the scale of self-confidence implying that I am self-confident have the knowledge and can also deal with most of the situations in a manner of positivity and helpful as well. I also scored quite high on the scale of working with others and support networks implying that am quite confident in terms of both interactions as well as the support I get from others. I see the benefits of sharing my stress with the people I work with.
Sociology – Critical Research Essay Information and Questions
As per assertiveness, the overall score in assertiveness is high; however, the score is in the low range in terms of aggressive scale and passive scale. Consistent behaviour is considered to be the key to the establishment of good relationships at work, along with the creation of an atmosphere that is creative, calm, as well as productive n terms of the workplace. Inconsistency is considered to be a tendency of flipping between aggressive behaviour and assertive behaviour or aggressive behaviour and passive behaviour will lead to distrust between me and my colleagues, and thus, I may find people starting to neglect me. I have the ability to put my point properly; however, with inconsistency. I may try telling others the things I need with more clarity. I don’t require giving excuses for my explanation. I have scored in the middle scale in terms of passiveness, and thus I am sometimes passive. People who are occasionally passive are considered to be bottling up the emotions, allowing resentment for building until they burst and flip into aggression. I can start through the explanation of the things that I want from a specific circumstance. I have also scored in the middle range in terms of aggression, and I am thus over emotional in terms of expectations that I need that are to be met. I can have the awareness that people may be varying a great deal in their appetite for disagreements, so as per the tips I should be careful not for making them feel uncomfortable.
I scored 72 in sound decision-making. Thus, as per the score, I have the ability to have a good grasp of the basics of sound decision-making, although the improvements to my process, along with the approach helping me in making betterment in decisions with more confidence. I can try expanding the sources of relevant information that have been taken into account, along with checking for biases and gaps within the information, as well as involving others in the issues of mitigation such blind-spots, along with the tendency of making assumptions.
In terms of personality insight, I scored high in terms of extraversion and that means I am likely to have participated in social gatherings, enjoy being with different people, have perseverance with full energy, prefer a job that is sociable at a faster pace with lots of interaction with other people. I also scored high in terms of agreeableness in terms of a good atmosphere for the team along with having a harmonious environment for working. I can avoid arguments with people having different opinions and can negate my feelings in order to neglect the unpleasantness or any kind of conflict with them. As per my emotional stability, I have scored in the middle range and that implies that I am likely to cope with stress and pressure and still have effectiveness. I can be doing quite well as a manager, and having a balance of the sensitivity required for working with others with the tough approach is in requirement sometimes. I have also scored middle range in conscientiousness and high in terms of openness.
In the segment of temperament, my specific kind is ENTP which is extraversion, intuition, thinking and perceiving. Being in the segment of ENTP, I am considered to be full of innovation as well as enthusiasm and I love challenging the quo of the status. Being in the specific segment, I am likely to be having success at everything that excites me and are of interest to me. However, there is a bad habit of not finishing it after it starts. As per the tips, I can learn prioritising for betterment, improving my skills listening, learning a middle path between giving in and confrontation and asking for before the arrival of a crisis.
As per assertiveness, the overall score in assertiveness is high; however, the score is in the low range in terms of aggressive scale and passive scale. Consistent behaviour is considered to be the key to the establishment of good relationships at work, along with the creation of an atmosphere that is creative, calm, as well as productive n terms of the workplace. I have scored in the middle scale in terms of passiveness, and thus I am sometimes passive. People who are occasionally passive are considered to be bottling up the emotions, allowing resentment for building until they burst and flip into aggression. I can start through the explanation of the things that I want from a specific circumstance. I have also scored in the middle range in terms of aggression, and I am thus over emotional in terms of expectations that I need that are to be met. I can have the awareness that people may be varying a great deal in their appetite for disagreements, so as per the tips I should be careful not for making them feel uncomfortable.
As my score is in the range of 65-85 in sound decision-making, I should try the expansion of the information that can be of relevance that can be taken into consideration, as well as checking for gaps within the information. I can also try to generate more options for choosing between the formal frameworks and then use them for evaluation. For instance, I can create a specific spreadsheet that shows the significant aspects for taking into consideration, along with assigning them a weighing in accordance with the relative significance, as well as rating and comparing the options individually due to the addition of the scores.
Conclusions
The reflective key benefits of the Rolfe model are that it is related to clarity and simplicity. The tools of any reflective essay need to be accessible and useful to me for the production of meaningful outcomes, and a simple model like the Rolfe model can possibly support that. As per my personal resilience, the score of my overall resilience is quite high and this leads to the fact that I am quite resilient. This is considered to be indicating myself, my limitations as well as the things that I can tackle. I also scored high in terms of agreeableness in terms of a good atmosphere for the team along with having a harmonious environment for working. I can avoid arguments with people having different opinions and can negate my feelings in order to neglect the unpleasantness or any kind of conflict with them. As per my emotional stability, I have scored in the middle range and that implies that I am likely to cope with stress and pressure and still have effectiveness. I can be doing quite well as a manager, and having a balance of the sensitivity required for working with others with the tough approach is in requirement sometimes.
According to the score, I enjoy myself in terms of sorting out challenges and addressing events. I have the tendency of bouncing back from the challenges and look out for positivity with adversity. My coping with challenge score is in the middle range and that implies that I am in possession of effective methods in terms of change management; however, it is tested sometimes. This has the possibility of reducing my performance in the work due to increased stress; however, it can be kept in check on a regular basis. I scored high in problem-solving and this means that I like facing problems that can be solved by me.
Reference
Bass, J., Sidebotham, M., Creedy, D. and Sweet, L., 2020. Exploring the needs and experiences of educators in facilitating the use of the Bass Model of Holistic Reflection. Nurse education in practice, 46, p.102805.
Mckenna, R., 2019. Reflection: Theories and Approaches.
Rolfe, M.I., Donoghue, D.A., Longman, J.M., Pilcher, J., Kildea, S., Kruske, S., Kornelsen, J., Grzybowski, S., Barclay, L. and Morgan, G.G., 2017. The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need?. BMC health services research, 17(1), pp.1-13.
Van Tress, J.J., 2020. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients’ Sociological Resilience, Self-Determination, and Decision-Making for Life-Sustaining Treatments.
Furlong, L., Serry, T., Erickson, S. and Morris, M.E., 2018. Processes and challenges in clinical decision‐making for children with speech‐sound disorders. International journal of language & communication disorders, 53(6), pp.1124-1138.
Nogueira, S.S., Nogueira-Filho, S.L., Duarte, J. and Mendl, M., 2021. Temperament, Plasticity, and Emotions in Defensive Behaviour of Paca (Mammalia, Hystricognatha). Animals, 11(2), p.293.
Krakover, S. and Corsale, A., 2021. Sieving tourism destinations: Decision-making processes and destination choice implications. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing (JTHSM), 7(1), pp.33-43.
Eggers, K., Millard, S. and Kelman, E., 2021. Temperament and the Impact of Stuttering in Children Aged 8–14 Years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(2), pp.417-432.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019. Building and measuring community resilience: Actions for communities and the Gulf research program.
Ungar, M., 2018. Systemic resilience. Ecology and Society, 23(4).
