Fun or rather experiences experiment is a widespread goal. Individuals often tell their acquaintances as well as their friends to have fun when they want to engage in some activities, and would again frequently inquire if it was fun afterwards. Renowned media personalities usually highlight the concept of having fun in their work. For instance, a pop song sang by Cyndi Lauper called Girls Just Wanna Have Fun, Snoop Dogg, and Wiz Khalifa’s Young, Wild and Free, or rather a 1993 autobiography of Amelia Earhart called The Fun of It. Most individuals take family road trips accompanied by activity books that indicate diverse ways of having fun in a car, some decide to engage in thrilling activities such as skydiving. Presumably, individuals pursue exiting experiences due to their enjoyable effective state that, though few studies have been conducted on the precise affective state(s) linked with engaging in exciting experiences. For instance, the words fun or exciting experience do not appear as subject terms in any known emotion or rather social-psychology textbooks or handbooks.
There are various types of exciting experiences and different individuals have different tests for these activities. Examples of these experiences include watching daredevil videos or engaging in thrilling extreme sports such as bungee jumping, skydiving, acro-paragliding, rafting, canyoning, high-diving, and many others (Davis, 2018). These activities are considered dangerously adventurous they impact those who engage in them. However, these effects might differ with respect to gender or age. Similarly, the propensity of individuals’ engagement in these activities may differ again with regard to age and gender. Most studies have been conducted focusing on the impacts of engaging exciting experiments on individuals’ personalities. For instance, Hanna et al. (2019) conducted a study drawing from the conflicting opinions concerning outdoor adventure tourism practices to examine if they may significantly be regarded as helpful for both humans and nature, as well as how they may provide paths for workable travel practice. The study drew on data gathered from a succession of interviews with adventure travellers. The research’s analysis emphasized how open-air adventure tourism enhances reconnections with nature, providing latent wellbeing impressions as well as pro-environmental attitudes and conducts. Hanna et al. (2019) resolved that these experiences, as a means of maintainable tourism, have probable consequences on individuals’ comprehension of, as well as engagement with sustainability, psychological health, and wellbeing.
Similarly, another study by Tukaiev et al. (2020) was conducted to evaluate the individual mental features that impact stress resistance intrinsic in climbers who are sportsmen facing high jeopardies. 60 climbers were selected from the Federation of Mountaineering and Climbing Kyiv branch as well as from the climbing unit of the National Aviation University with 26 participants being women while 34 were men, within the age bracket of 18 to 30 years old (Tukaiev et al., 2020). Tests such as Cattell’s Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Eysenck Personality Inventory, Diagnostics of Stress-Resistance Level (‘Forecast’), the “Personality Differential” technique were utilized by the researchers (Tukaiev et al., 2020). The study detected high as well as average levels of stress resistance in 42 rock climbers which is 70% of the total sample size while most grownups involved in no dangerous sports had the average stress resistance levels. Tukaiev et al. (2020) concluded that the structure of stress resistance of sportspersons facing high dangers is balanced as well as defined by an individual’s systemic volitional aptitudes such as strength and stability, self-control manners, and the nervous system features that are pigeonholed by vulnerability to external events.
In another study, McEwa et al. (2019) performed a meta-analysis to determine personality traits association and high-peril sport participation. The study involved effect sizes of 149 gathered from 39 appropriate articles in which the comparison between characteristic traits of high-peril sport participants with either low-peril sport participants or rather persons not engaged in any sport was performed. The research outcome indicated noteworthy effect sizes was in support of the high-peril participants for sensation seeking, extraversion, as well as impulsivity (McEwa et al., 2019). The study also found substantial effect sizes in support of the comparator groups for neuroticism, telic dominance, as well as sensitivity to punishment. However, McEwa et al. (2019) also found out that there were no significant variances in psychoticism, sensitivity to reward, socialization, amicability, conscientiousness, or rather openness.
Despite several studies conducted on the relationship between personality and endangerment in exciting experiences, there are limited researches that have focused on how these activities impact individuals with regard to age and gender, or rather whether gender determines the propensity of engagement in these sports. Therefore, the current experiment is intended to determine whether the anxiety level in older individuals would be more as compared to younger ones, whether female gender anxiety level would be higher than that of their male counterparts when viewing daredevil videos, as well as whether the males are more likely to engage in daredevil activities as compared to female. The study topic of this experiment is highly pertinent to the young adult of the modern American population that is highly stricken by anxiety, inaccessibility of quality medical care and insurance are for many, as well as the increased utilization of smart devices for daily needs.
While exciting experiences have been considered to be beneficial in various ways when performed in an unswerving pattern, this study intended to find out whether or not watching a daredevil video would be calming as well as mood-boosting rather than participants directly engaging in the thrilling experiences. The current experiment’s tested hypothesis was that older individuals and the female gender would be more anxious as compared to younger and the male gender when watching daredevil videos and males are more likely to perform daredevil activities than their female counterparts, which I also presumed to be the correct outcome. A correct hypothesis for the current study would shine a light on the general effectiveness of watching daredevil videos than practically engaging in daredevil activities and possibly establish more alternatives for college students, habitually young adults, the main demographic in contemporary studies of anxiety, to efficiently manage their mood and stress levels with a cost as well as time-effective instrument. However, an incorrect hypothesis could offer similar expediency by recommending the effectiveness of certain forms of anxiety-management practices. An incorrect hypothesis could divulge that neither technique significantly decreases participants’ levels of anxiety and thus most of the young adults in the United States of America would spend most of their time spent on other anxiety-management practices.
Davis, B. (2018). Which of the following activities would also likely provide participants with an adrenaline rush? MVOrganizing. https://www.mvorganizing.org/which-of-the-following-activities-would-also-likely-provide-participants-with-an-adrenaline-rush/
Hanna, P., Wijesinghe, S., Paliatsos, I., Walker, C., Adams, M., & Kimbu, A. (2019). Active engagement with nature: outdoor adventure tourism, sustainability, and wellbeing. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1621883
McEwan, D., Boudreau, P., Curran, T., & Rhodes, R. E. (2019). Personality traits of high-risk sport participants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.02.006
Tukaiev, S., Dolgova, O., Van Den Tol, A. J. M., Ruzhenkova, A., Lysenko, O., Fedorchuk, S., … & Voronova, V. (2020). Individual psychological determinants of stress resistance in rock climbers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(1), 469 – 476. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s1069Order Now